“We can’t see much at night.”
“You can see it all,” Addis said mildly. “You’ve
got to smell a strange town, feel it in your bones; hear the dogs bark, count
the saloons and the stores, listen to the wind on the street and notice the
pickle barrel on the depot platform.”
“I can see it all tomorrow,” he said.
“No,” Addis said. “You’ve got to look at a
town like you judge a woman. Appearance is mostly what she wants you to see in
her. And towns are like women. You’ve got to look underneath, look for the character
when you meet a woman. Not her face or her size. You see what you think is in
the woman. If you see just the body, the face, you see nothing. And a town is
like a woman.”
I am an unabashed Frank O’Rourke fan. He novel The
Last Chance [also reviewed on this blog] is easily in my top ten favorite
Western novels.
He offers easy unforced authenticity in his action, but
it is his facile offhand remarks and insights into character that mark his
breed. Small vignettes like the above that give much of his work a mature
flavor that raises it above the mere formulaic shoot ‘em up.
He allows these little homilies to inform who each
character is, often allowing us to find the size of them through a single act,
remark, thought or gesture.
Upon witnessing a soiled dove falling in the street…
“Jim do you think we should have helped?”
“Her?”
“She was in the mud. Did you see the bruises
on her legs?”
“You’ve got a quick eye, Tom.”
“I didn’t mean that,” Ellington said.
“I know it…but she went back for more.”
“But why, Jim?”
Addis bit off the tip of a wrinkled cigar,
licked the dry outer leaf, and scratched a match on the rosetted neck of the
wooden horse guarding the harness shop door.
“Human nature, Tom. Think she’d be in that
dive if she didn’t enjoy the life? She grew up, maybe she sang in a choir like
that one over yonder. Whatever happened, she didn’t say no. She had a man, some
more men, she went on the town. She was in the mud tonight, she’ll be in the
mud again. You can’t change people, Tom. That’s why I never interfere.”
O’Rourke’s observations remind me of John D. MacDonald’s
wry commentary found in his late 50’s and early 60’s work. And the MacDonald comparison
is apt, as this novel plays more as a noir tale than a strict oater.
While not O’Rourke’s best, still mighty mighty strong.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.