This memoir, composed in 1920, tells the tale of Mrs.
Richards and her husband Owen, Easterners, who decided to go West and run a
ranch in the Colorado of 1900.
Her penetrating eye limns the contrasts between two
lifestyles better than mere observers of the literature.
Here we have a wise intelligent woman who had lived in
one Life [the Eastern Way] and then plunged whole-heartedly into another Life
of a different, more vital timbre [The Western.]
To Mrs. Richards, the West was not just a region, but
an entire state of mind.
Allow me to remove myself while Mrs. Richards
testifies for herself.
[On the rough men she met upon arrival West. Keep in
mind, she came from polite Eastern society, and yet here…]
I was becoming very much interested. This
man was a distinctly new type to me. I did not know then that he was the old-time
cowpuncher, with an ease of manner a Chesterfield might have envied, and an
unfailing, almost deferential, courtesy toward women.
[There is no higher praise in comportment than to be compared
to Chesterfield.]
[The next lengthy passage really gets to the meat of
what makes the Western mind different.]
“For East is East and West is West, and
never the twain shall meet.” The phrase kept haunting me all through these
first days when everything was so new and strange. I almost felt as though I
had passed into a new phase of existence….
The
compelling reality of this new life affected me deeply. Non-essentials counted
for nothing. There were no artificial problems or values.
No one in the country cared who you might
have been or who you were. The Mayflower and Plymouth Rock meant nothing here.
It would be thought you were speaking of some garden flowers or some breed of
chickens.
The one thing of vital importance was what
you were-- how you adjusted yourself to meet conditions as you found them, and
how nearly you reached, or how far you fell below their measure of man or woman.
I felt as though up to this time I had
been in life's kindergarten, but that I had now entered into its school, and I
realized that only as I passed the given tests should I succeed.
I learned much from the rough, untutored
men with whom I was in daily association. They were men whose rules of conduct
were governed by individual choice, unhampered by conventions. They were so
direct and honest, so unfailingly kind and gentle toward any weaker thing, and
so simple and responsive, that I liked and trusted them from the first.
·
An association based upon ability or at
least the gumption to try.
·
Assigned identity means nothing, be you
Lord, Lady, Aristocrat, Commoner, or any identity label we apply today.
·
You were judged and valued for what you
did or waded into to or attempted to do.
·
Labels, titles, pronouns, certificates…all
paper dolls to the squared away.
Ranch life might be difficult; It was
never commonplace. The mere sight of a lone horseman on a distant hill
suggested greater possibilities of excitement than a multitude of people in a
city street.
·
Streets, screens, movie theater crowds—predictable.
·
Not the case with who you meet in areas
where it is hard to get to.
·
Personally, I have met many an intriguing
cat on backcountry outings, standing in the pit at demolition derbies, waiting
my turn to plunge a rapid, generally anyplace that most don’t go.
·
If you are where it is uncommon to go,
those you meet will be uncommon souls.
[The next, a lesson in facing life, and then facing it
again—no need for back pats or commemorative t-shirts. The reward is the act
and the satisfaction garnered for the next round of life experience.]
Should the horse rear and throw himself
backward, there is the greatest danger that the man may be caught under him and
killed, it happens so quickly, but these quiet, diffident chaps are absolutely
fearless, past masters in the art of riding, facing death each time they ride a
new horse, but facing it with the supreme courage of the commonplace, sitting
calmly in the saddle, racked, shaken, jolted until at times the blood streams
from their nose, yet after a short rest the rider “took up the next one” quite
as though nothing at all had happened.
[Men and Woman of Courtesy & Chivalry, but…a
little bit of Outlaw to the Soul—My cuppa!]
It was an unusual experience to live in
daily association with these men, in whom were combined characteristics of the
Knights of the Round Table and those peculiar to the followers of Jesse James.
[The world is levelled and we only raise another by
dint of ability.]
Strange, contrasting personalities—in awe
of nobody, quite as ready to converse familiarly with the President as with
Owen, but probably preferring Owen because they knew he was a fine horseman.
[In the next lengthy bit, Mrs. Richards expounds on ethics,
philosophy, and religion as she saw it there.]
Improvident and generous, however great
their vices might be, their lives were free from petty meanness; the prairies
had seemed to
“Give them their own deep breadth of view
The largeness of the cloudless blue.”
[Lucretius]
The religion of the cow puncture? My
impression was that he had none, for certainly he subscribed to no conventional
creed or dogma. Yet what was it that gave him a code of honor which made
cheating or a lie an unforgivable offense and a man guilty of either an outcast
scorned by his associates, and what was it that would have made him go without
bread or shelter that a woman or child might not suffer?
Rough and gentle, brutal and tender, good
and bad, not angel at one time and devil at another, but rather saint and sinner
at the same time. Little of religious
influence came into his life, and as for bibles--- there were none.
[Her sister Alice came to visit with her new husband
in tow—a bonafide “Dude” of almost stereotypical fashion. The contrast between this
man [lower case “m”] and the Men of the Weast is, well, a bit withering. To be
candid, we must ask ourselves—How do we measure stacked against Upper case
Men?]
During the drive back to the ranch I
thought of Alice and her future by the side of a man of that type. Our [hers
and Owen’s] future was uncertain enough, but if trouble and vicissitudes were
our portion, at least I had someone with whom to share them.
[Calls to mind Steinbeck’s observation on men often
growing more whiny and complaining as they age. “My wife married a man; I
see no reason why should inherit a baby.”]
Unless we chanced to have guests come for
weeks at a time the only women I saw were those in our employ, but I resented
having any of my friends think of my life as “dull” or “lonely.” On the
contrary it was fascinating, full of incident, rich in experience which money
could not buy. Living so close to the great heart of nature during those years
in the planes, the vision of life partook of their breadth and a new sense of
values replaced old, artificial standards.
To be alone in the vast prairie was to gain a new conception of infinity
and--eternity.
[The next on the diversity of those who went West, and
decided to raise up to what it is to be a Westerner. One must not be born there
to adopt the full-throated way of life.]
There was nothing prosaic about those who
group themselves around the great stone fireplaces on the ranches in the old
days. Here again were found those contrasts, so striking and unexpected; university
men who had come West for adventure or investment, men of wealth whose
predisposition to weak lungs had sent them in exile to the wilderness, modest
young Englishmen, those younger sons so often found in the most out of-the-way
corners of the earth, and who, through the sudden demise of a near relative,
has such a startling way of becoming earls and lords overnight; adventurous Scotchmen,
brilliant young Irishmen, all smoking contentedly there in the firelight
discussing the “isms” and “ogies” and every other subject under heaven. But
most interesting of all were their own reminiscences.
[All the philosophies, politics, et cetera of the
world could be offered, but nothing matched the reminiscences, the lived experience.
Perhaps we spend too much time in abstraction and not enough “get out there” living
bumps and bruises to have reminiscences worthy to share around a ranch’s stone fireplace.
May that not be true for us. Sad for us if it is.]
In the East life seems to be static. But
in the West it is in a state of flux and conditions are constantly changing.
[In a truly lived life, more things occur and change
than in our newsfeed.]
[Towards the end of the volume she offers the below, a
more fitting prescription for living I can not fathom.]
From the vast spaces, under the
guardianship of that commanding summit, we had gained a new sense of
proportion, freedom from hampering trivialities and a
broader vision of life and its responsibilities.
May we all learn from Mrs. Richards and get out there
and live, gain a new sense of proportion and freedom from hampering trivialities
and a broader vision of life and its responsibilities.
I simply adore this book.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.